EMBASSY OF NICARAGUA
THEHAGUE

NICARAGUA'S COMMENTS ON COLOMBIA'SRESPONSE TO JUDGE
BENNOUNA'S QUESTION

1. Colombia makes three points in its summary response to Judge Bennouna's question,
each of which is either incorrect or misleading.

2. First, Colombia asserts that in the present case there are no areas of continental shelf

lying more than 200M from the nearest land territory.

1. Question Asked By Judge Koroma on 1 November 1995.

Part 1 of Question: Was resolution WHA 46.40 validly adopted?

Response:

Yes. Under Article 96 (2) of the United Nations Charter, specialized agencies may
request advisory opinions if authorized to do so by the General Assembly. Such

authorization is contained inArticle X.2 of the Agreement between the United Nations and
WHO.

Resolution WHA 46.40 was adopted in accordance with Article 76 of the

CORRESPONDENCE

QUATRIÈME PARTIE

CORRESPONDANCE QU.~TRIÈIIE PARTIE. - CORRESPOXDANCE
4*

1. THE AMBASSADOR IO THE NETHERL.+XDS OF THE UNITED STATES
OF AMERICA IO THE REGISTRAR
-4merican Embassy, THE HAGUE.

Annex Al to GEN90/13

Letter dated 13 February 1990 from the Agent of
Guinea-Bissau to the Registrar

[Translation)

Brussels, 13 February 1990
No. 1.57/EGBB/1990

Sir,

PART IV
-

CORRESPONDENCE

CORRESPONDANCE86 PART IV.--CORRESPONDENCE

1. THE SECRETARY-GESERA OPLTHE UNITED NATIONS TO THE
PRESIDENT OF THE INTERSATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
New York, z December 1954.

[See p. 8.1

2. 1.E GREEEIER AU MINISTRE DES AFFAIRES ÉTRANGERES D'AFCH.~NISTAN '

[Translation]

Reply of the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya
to the question of President SCHWEBEL

1.Libya's case, such as it was argued during the hearing on Wednesday 22 October 1997, is that there
has been an abuse or misuse of power if the Security Council has determined that there exists a
threat to the peace as the basis for requiring Liba to surrender the accused to the United States
or to the United Kingdom.

PARTIlT

CORRESPONDENCE

QUATRICMEPARTIE

CORRESPONDANCE590 PART IV.-CORllESPONDEECE

1. THE CHIEF OF GOVERNME>:T OF THE PRISCIPALITY OF
LIPCHTESSTEIS TC)THE REGIÇTRAR

Vaduz [undated]
[received in Registry on December 17th, 19511.

02/05 '9i 16:55 ~~ +421 i 5162355 MZVSR OMSD +·H OSPINA 141002

COMMENTS OF SLOVAKIA ON HUNGARY'S ANSWER
TO THE QUESTION OF JUDGE RANJEVA, POSED ON 7 MARCH 1997

Slovakia wishes to make a few, brief comments on Hungary·s Answer to the
following Question of Judge Ranjeva:

,Can Hungary draw up a table calling to mind:

(1) the financial commitmentsannouncedby the Union of Soviet Socialist
Republies;

CASE CONCERNING OIL PLATFORMS

ŒSLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA)

PRELIMINARY OBJECTION

RESPONSE OF THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN TO
VICE-PRESIDENT SCHWEBEL'S QUESTION

"ln these proceedings, both Parties cite documents from the ratification processes of

treaties offriendship, commerce and navigation to shed light on their intentions in concluding

the 1955 Treaty of Amity, Economie Relations and Consular Rights in the terms in which it

EMBRSSY OF SINGRPOREIN BRUSSELS N0.210 P.2
30.NOV.2007 11:55

CASE CONCERNING SOVEREIGNTY OVER PEDRA BRANCA/
PULAU BATU PUTEB, MIDDLE ROCKS AND SOUTH LEDGE

(MALAYSIA/SINGAPORB)

RESPONSE OF SINGAPORE TO THE QUESTION POSED BY

JUDGE KEITH TO BOTH PARTIES ON 16 NOVEMBER 2007'

Question