CORRESPONDENCE
CORRESPONDANCE1. THE DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION TO THE
REGISTRAR OF THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
21 May 19RO.
[Seep. 3,supra.]
2. THE REGISTRAR TO THE DIRECTOR-GENERAL OFTHE WHO
28 May 1980.
CORRESPONDENCE
CORRESPONDANCE 1. LE MINISTRE DES AFFAIRES ÉTRANCÈRES DE TUNISIE
AU GREFFIERDE LA COUR INTERNATIONALEDE JUSTICE
[Voir 1p. 31
2. LE GREFFIER AU MINISTRE DES AFFAIRES ETRANGER DEESTUNISIE
1" décembre 1978.
CORRESPONDENCE
CORRESPONDANCE . 1. TH!: SI:CKIyThROF STATB OF TH11 UNITED STATESOF AMEKlCA TO THE
I'KtlSlBlXOF THE INTERNATlONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
Washington, 29 Novcmbcr 1979.
[Translation]
Reply by Senegal to the questions put on 12 February 1990
by Judge Oda
First Question
Under what internal law or acts of Senegal did the Senegalese Navy
board the fishing vessel Hoyo Maru No. 8 and take it to the port of
Dakar on 9 October 1989, and was the Captain of the vessel subjected to
judicial proceedings as a result of which he was ord.ered to pay a fine of
CORRESPONDENCE CORRESPONDENCE 111
1. THE AGENT FOR THE GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN TO THE REOISTRAR
11 May 1973.
Reply of the Republic of Burundi to the questions posed by Judges Koroma,
Bennouna and Cançado Trindade at the close of the oral proceedings
[Translation]
The Republic of Burundi thanks the Court for allowing it once again to express its opinion
on certain aspects of the questions put to the C ourt by the General Assembly. The brief comments
which follow are intended to provide some elements of a reply to two of the three questions posed
by the Court.
Question 1 [question posed by Judge Koroma]:
PARTIV
CORRESPONDENCE
CORRESPONDANCE82 PIRT I\..-COHHESPOSDENCE
1. THE A>IBASSAUOK TO THE NETHEI<I.ANDS OF THE UKITEU KINGDOM
OF GREAT BHlTAlN AND NOKTHERN IKliLAND TO THI! KEGISTRAR OF THE
INTERN.4TIONAI. COURT OF JUSTICE
I3ritisli Embnssy, THE HAGUE
PARTIV
CORRESPONDENCE
QUATRIÈME PARTIE
-
CORRESPONDANCE32 PART IV.-CORRESPOXDESCE
1. THE A3lBASS.4DOR TO THE NETHERLANDS OF THE UNITED STATES
OF AMERICA TO THE REGISTRAR
CORRESPONDENCE 1. THE AGENT FOR THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA TO THE REGISTRAR
30 August 1971.
[Seep. 3, supra.]
2. THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR TO THE MINISTER FOR EXTERNALAFPAIRS OF PAKISTAN
(telegram)
30 August 1971.
Annex to LUK92/18
Replies by Libya to the questions put by Judge SChwebel
Libya understands that the thrust of the three questions put by
Judge Schwebel is to obtain the views of the Parties on the question
whether the Montreal Convention (various Articles thereof, particularly
10 and 12) applies when the "persan" who has committed the offence and is