372 BORDER AND TRANSBORDER ARMED ACTIONS

7 July 1988

I h;ivc th< hunour to rcfcr to the qur.stioiis put to the Pnrtics hv hlcmbcr, of

22-12-2009 17:ss P.02

INTERîNA.TIONAI~COURT OltJUSTlCE

R~ëst,fir:·an Advisory Opinion

:r.'ls:JlYnîlatettl ëclaranonof-1ndepe1Ule,itëby th:e'Provisional

ln~tîtütioniQfSeljJGtJvemmen tf Kosovo·inaccotdance. with

.intirrttatioiw.l ?''

l(EPJJµ()Fl1iE GoVERNMENT OF AUSTRIA TO AiDDJTION~~

QIJÈS1:I0NS BYTHE COURT

[Translation]

Reply of the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya
to the question of President SCHWEBEL

1.Libya's case, such as it was argued during the hearing on Wednesday 22 October 1997, is that there
has been an abuse or misuse of power if the Security Council has determined that there exists a
threat to the peace as the basis for requiring Liba to surrender the accused to the United States
or to the United Kingdom.

Legality of the Use by a.State of !"uclear Weapons in Armed Conjlict

Legality of the Threat or Use ofNuclear Weapons

Licéitée l'utilisation des armes nucléairespar un Etat diJnsun conflit armé

Licéitéde la menace oul'emploi d'armes nucléaires

WRITTEN REPLIES TO QUESTIONS PUT BY

MEMBERS OF THE COURT

RÉPONSES ÉCRITES AUX QUESTIONS POSÉES PAR

LES MEMBRES DE LA COURWHO Response of the World Health Organization

Question of Vice-President Schwebel

In these proceedings, both Parties cite documents from the
ratification processes of treaties of friendship, commerce and

navigation to shed light on their intentions in concluding the
1955 Treaty of Amity, Economie Relations and Consular Rights in
the terms in which it was concluded.

INTERNATIONALCOURTOFJUSTICE

ACCORDANCEWITHINTERNATIONALLAWOF
THE UNILATERALDECLARATIONOFINDEPENDENCEBYTHE
PROVISIONALINSTITUTIONSOFSELF-GOVERNMENTOFKOSOVO
(REQUESTFORANADVISORYOPINION)

ANSWEROFTHE REPUBLICOFSERBIATOTHE QUESTIONSPUTTO

THEPARTICIPANTSIN THEORALPROCEEDINGSBYJUDGESKOROMA,

BENNOUNAANDCANÇADOTRINDADE

1. QUESTIONPUTBYJUDGEKOROMA

The question:

"Ithas been contended that international law does not prohibit the secession of a

384 BORDERANDTRANSBORDERARMEDACTIONS

rcply gitcn Ii? Your E~cel1r.n~~ai the sanie sittii(<,<pro p. 141) cvcn ihoush
iiw:i~thcn dcscribcd as "3 parii:ll answer". andiiu,a,furihcr stated ai ihe<II-
ting i~i14Junr. 1988that ihc question< put w<~ulrh lc :lnsu,crcd in writing

104. THE AGENT OF HONDURAS TO THE REGISTRAR

The Hague, 19July 1988.

INTERNATIONCOURTOFJUSTICE

CASECONCERNINAGRMED
ACTIVITIES

ONTHETERRITORY
OFTHECONGO

DEMOCR TICREPUBLIOFTHECONGO
v.

UGANDA

UGANDA'OBSERVATIONOSNTHEDRC'SRESPONSESOJUDGESQ' UESTIONS
13MAY20051. Uganda's Observations on the DRC's Response to the Question of Judge Vereshchetin

NO .32 P. 2

QUESTIONSFROMTHECOURT-WRITTEN REPLYBVTHEREPUBLJC OFCYPRUS

1. "lt has been contended that international law does not prohibit the secession of a
territory from a sovereign State.Could participants inthese proceedings address the

Court on the principles and rules of international law, ifany, which, outside the
colonial context, permit the secessionof a territory from a sovereignState without the
latter's consent?" [JudgeKoroma]

INTERNATIONALCOURTOFJUSTICE

ACCORDANCEWITHINTERNATIONALLAW OFTHEUNILATERAL
DECLARATIONOFINDEPENDENCEBYTHEPROVISIONAL
INSTITUTIONSOFSELF-GOVERNMENTOFKOSOVO
(REQUESTFORADVISORYOPINION}

RESPONSESUBMITTEDBY FINLAND
TO QUESTIONSOFJUDGEKOROMAANDJUDGECANÇADOTRINDADE