Cameroon's observations on Nigeria's written responses to the questions put by Members of the Court

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE

CASE CONCERNING LAND AND MARITIME BOUNDARY

(CAMEROON V.NIGERIA)

Observations ofthe Republic of Cameroon on the responses by the Federal Republic of

Nigeria to the questions put to it byMembers of the Court

JUDGE FLEISCHHAUER'S QUESTIONS

1.Judge Fleischhauer put the following questions to the two Parties:

Letter from the Deputy Agent of Bosnia and Herzegovina transmitting to the Court the answer of the Government of Bosnia and Herzegovina to the question put by the Vice-President

MEl 12 2006 2:0SPM HP LASERJET 3200
p. 1

VAN DEN BIESEN BOESVELD

ADVOCATEN

SARPHATPI LAZA
Rhijnspoorplein 22, 1018 TX AMSTERDAM

Nigeria's reply to the questions put by Judges Fleischhauer, Kooijmans and Elaraby and Nigeria's comments on Cameroon's reply to the questions put by Judge Fleischhauer

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE

CASE CONCERNING
.THE LAND AND MARITIME BOUNDARY
BETWEEN CAMEROON AND NIGERIA

(Carrieroon v. Nigeria: Equatorial Guinea intervening)

Comments of the Federal Republic of Nigeria

on the answers to the Judges' Questions

submitted by Cameroon on 10 Marèh 2002

4 April2002 1

Comments on the answers to the Judges' Questions submitted by Cameroon on

1 0 March 2002

Written answers of Italy to the questions posed by Judges Oda and Lacharrière at the hearing held on 30 January 1984

CORRESPONDENCE 505

In truth it may be said that very often the terms "median line" and "equidis-
tant line" are used interchangeably and no sofe conclusions canbe drawn from
the use of either of lhese terms. For exarnple, the geographical situation be-

Reply of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela to questions posed by Judges Koroma and Cançado Trindade at the close of the oral proceedings

Comments of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela to the questions

submitted by Judges Koroma and Cançado Trindade on December 11,

2009 with respect to the request of an advisory opinion on the

"Accordance with International Law of the Unilateral Declaration of

lndependence by the Provisional Institutions of Self-Government of

Kosovo"

Written answers of Libya to the questions posed by members of the Court during the oral proceedings

CORRESPONDANCE 295

La Libye, signataire de la convention sur le droit de la mer de 1982, nesaurait

valablement contester la validité desr6giescodifiéespar cette convention.

44.THE AGENT OF THE LIBYANARAB JAMAHlRlYA
TO THE REGISTRAR

19June 1985.

1have the honour to fwnish the Court with Libva'sresnonses to the auestions
put to Libya hy Judge Elias and Judge Oda.

Subscribe to
Links