372 NUCLEAR TESTS
the terms of Article 62 of the Statute of the Court, in the N~iclear Tests case
(Aitsrralia v. France). 1have the honour to sendyou herewith three copies of the
bilingual edition. printed by the Registry, of that Application.
74. THE REGISTRAR TO THE SECRETARY-GENER AFLTHE UNITEDNATIONS'
30 May 1973
- 2 -
[Translation]
Answer by the Republic of Guinea-Bissau to the question
put on 8 April 1991 by Judge Weeramantry
The question putto both Parties by Judge Weeramantry at the sitting
of 8 April 1991 was as follows:
"If the Tribunal had held that the Agreement of 1960 was
binding only in respect of the territorial sea, but not in
13 July 2000
QATAR'S RESPONSE TO THE QUESTION PUT BY JUDGE PARRA-ARANGUREN
TO QATAR AND BAHRAIN
At the hearing of 29 June 2000, Judge Parra-Aranguren addressed the following question to
both Parties:
"What is the extent and what are the territorial limits of Zubarah? An accurate
description would be appreciated, with indication of the evidence supporting the
answer".
Qatar'sresponse is as follows:
[Translation]
Reply by Senegal to the questions put on 12 February 1990
by Judge Oda
First Question
Under what internal law or acts of Senegal did the Senegalese Navy
board the fishing vessel Hoyo Maru No. 8 and take it to the port of
Dakar on 9 October 1989, and was the Captain of the vessel subjected to
judicial proceedings as a result of which he was ord.ered to pay a fine of
Reply of the Republic of Burundi to the questions posed by Judges Koroma,
Bennouna and Cançado Trindade at the close of the oral proceedings
[Translation]
The Republic of Burundi thanks the Court for allowing it once again to express its opinion
on certain aspects of the questions put to the C ourt by the General Assembly. The brief comments
which follow are intended to provide some elements of a reply to two of the three questions posed
by the Court.
Question 1 [question posed by Judge Koroma]:
Annex to LUK92/18
Replies by Libya to the questions put by Judge SChwebel
Libya understands that the thrust of the three questions put by
Judge Schwebel is to obtain the views of the Parties on the question
whether the Montreal Convention (various Articles thereof, particularly
10 and 12) applies when the "persan" who has committed the offence and is
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
ACCORDANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL LAW
OF THE UN/LATERAL DECLARATION OF
INDEPENDENCE BY THE PROVJSIONAL INSTITUTIONS
OF SELF-GOVERNMENT OF KOSOVO
(REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION)
ANSWERS GIVEN BY THE KINGDOM OF SPAIN
TO THE QUESTIONS POSED BY JUDGES KOROMA,
BENNOUNA AND CANÇADO TRINDADE
Annex to LUS 92/17
Replies by Libya to the questions put by Judge SChwebel
Libya understands that the thrust of the three questions put by
Judge Schwebel is to obtain the views of the Parties on the question
whether the Montreal Convention (various Articles thereof, particularly
EMBASSY OF NICARAGUA
THE HAGUE
5 April2007
Sir,
1have the honour to refer to your letter of 29 March 2007 sent in relation to the
case concerning Maritime Delimitation between Nicaragua and Honduras in the
Caribbean Sea (Nicaragua v. Honduras), by which you inform me that the President has
ESTADO PLURINACIONAL DE BOLIVIA
Embajada LaHaya - Paises Bajos
BOLIVIA'S COMMENTS ON CHILE'S REPLY
TO JUDGE OWADA'S QUESTION
1. Bolivia hereby respectfully submits its comments to Chile's 13 May 2015 reply to Judge
Owada's question to the parties. Chile's reply merely repeats its argument that the 1904Treaty