other_document

Title
Other documents

Written reply of the Marshall Islands to the questions put by Judge Cançado Trindade at the public sitting held on the afternoon of 16 March 2016

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE

OBLIGATIONS CONCERNING NEGOTIATIONS RELATING TO CESSATION OF
THE NUCLEAR ARMS RACE ANDTO NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT

(Marshall Islandsnited Kingdom) (Preliminary Objections)

Reply ofthe Marshall Islands

to the question put by Judge Cançado Trindade at the end ofthe public sitting of
16 March 2016 at 3 p.m.

*

Question:

The Marshall Islands, in the course of thetensubmissions and oral

Comments of India on the written reply of the Marshall Islands to the question put by Judge Cançado Trindade at the public sitting held on the morning of 16 March 2016

l

AMBASSADOR OF INDIA
THE HAGU~ (THE NETHERLANDS)

HAG/POL/443/3/2014

29 March, 2016

Excellency,

1 have the honour to fOI-wardthe Note received from the Agent of
the Govemment of lndia in the case regarding Obligations concerning
Negotiations relating to Cessation of the Nuclear Arms Race and to
Nuclear Disarmament (Marshall Islands v. ln dia)

Written reply of India to the question put by Judge Cançado Trindade at the public sitting held on the morning of 16 March 2016

~ 4~i~ ê1~ tl,
MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS
NEW DELHI

23 March 2016

Excellency,

Reference the question posed by Judge CancadoTrindade at the conclusion
of oral hearings on 16 March 2016 in the case regarding Obligations concerning
Negotiations relating to Cessationof Nuclear ArmsRaceandto Nuclear Disarmament
(Marshall Islands v lndia).

Written reply of the Marshall Islands to the question put by Judge Cançado Trindade at the public sitting held on the morning of 16 March 2016

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE

OBLIGATIONS CONCERNING NEGOTIATIONS RELATING TO
CESSATION OF THE NUCLEAR ARMS RACE AND TO NUCLEAR
DISARMAMENT

(Marshall Islands v. India) (Jurisdiction)

. Reply of the Marsha11Islands
to the question put by Judge Cançado Trindade at the end of the public sitting of
16 March 2016 at 10 a.m.

*

Question:

Written reply of Chile to the question put by Judge Owada at the public sitting held on the afternoon of 8 May 2015

REPUBLIC OF CHILE
Ministry of Foreign Affairs

May 12th, 2015

H.E. Mr Philippe Couvreur
Registrar
International Court of Justice
Peace Palace

The Hague
The Netherlands

Sir,

ObUgation to Negotiate Attess to the Patifit Ocean (Bolivia v. Chile)
Chile's Answer to Judge Owada'squestion concerning tite meaning of "sovereign access to the sea"

Comments of the United States on the Replies of Iran to the questions put by Judge Rigaux

COMMENTS OF THE UNITED STATES ON IRAN'S REPLY TO THE

QUESTIONS PUT BY JUDGE R.IGAUXTO BOTH PARTIES

Premièrequestion: quel est le statut juridique de plates-formes pétrolièresaménagéespar
un Etat sur son plateau continental? Quelles sont les compétencesexercéessur ces installations?

Quelle est la différenceentre le statut des plates-formes pétrolièresselon qu'elles sont localisées
respectivement dans la mer territoriale d'un Etat ou en dehors de celle-ci?

Comments on lran's Reply:

Written reply of Bolivia to the question put by Judge Owada at the public sitting held on the afternoon of 8 May 2015

ESTADOPLURINACIONALDEBOLIVIA

Embajada La Haya - Paises Bajos

Bolivia's Response to the Question of Judge Owada

Bolivia has the honour herewith to submit its response to the question of Judge Owada on

defining the meaning of the term "sovereign access to the sea" and determining the specifie

content of that term as used for determining its position on the jurisdiction of the Court.

With regard to the relevance of this question to the jurisdiction of the Court, Bolivia observes

Subscribe to other_document
Links