written_pleading

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
CASE CONCERNING
CERTAIN IRANIAN ASSETS
(ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA)
OBSERVATIONS AND SUBMISSIONS
ON THE U.S. PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS
SUBMITTED BY THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
01 SEPTEMBER 2017
IN THE NAME OF GOD
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
CASE CONCERNING
CERTAIN IRANIAN ASSETS
(ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA)
OBSERVATIONS AND SUBMISSIONS
ON THE U.S. PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS
SUBMITTED BY THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
CERTAIN IRANIAN ASSETS
(ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA)
PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS
SUBMITTED BY
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
MAY 1, 2017
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER 1: Introduction and Overview ........................................................................ 1
Section A: Iran’s Case ..................................................................................................... 2

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
CASE CONCERNING
CERTAIN IRANIAN ASSETS
(ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA)
MEMORIAL
OF THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
01 FEBRUARY 2017

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
REQUEST BY THE UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY
FOR AN ADVISORY OPINION ON THE
“LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF THE SEPARATION OF THE CHAGOS
ARCHIPELAGO FROM MAURITIUS IN 1965”
WRITTEN COMMENTS OF
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
MAY 15, 2018

1. The Gnn:rnment or the Republic or Seychelles submitted 011 28 Februar) 2018 a
writlc11 statcmcnt to the International Court or .Justioe in relation to the l IN
Gencral Assembly's rcquest for an Advisory Opinion or the Court on the Legat
Co11scq11c11ces of lhe 5,'epora/ion ol thc Clwgo.,· ArchiJJc/ogo .fi'o111 Mauritius in
/965.
rhe questions put Lo the Court ure as roi lm, s:
a) ··Wus the prooess or decolonization or Mauritius lawrully completed whcn

,'
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF THE
SEPARATION OF THE CHAGOS
ARCHIPELAGO FROM MAURITIUS IN 1965
(Request for Advisory Opinion)
WRITTEN COMMENTS BY THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
MAY2018
. 1
1.
1. In accordance with the Order of the International Court of Justice of 14 July 2017
and the Order of 17 January 2018, the Republic of Serbia hereby submits its Written Comments.
Written statements by a number of States and of the African Union support position that the

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF THE SEPARATION OF THE
CHAGOS ARCHIPELAGO FROM MAURITIUS IN 1965
(REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION)
WRITTEN COMMENTS
OF THE REPUBLIC OF NICARAGUA
15 May 2018
Table of Contents
I. Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1
II. The Right to Self-Determination prior 1968 .............................................................. 1

COPY
Page 1 of 6
LAOL
LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF THE SEPARATION OF THE CHAGOS ARCHIPELAGO FROM MAURITIUS IN 1965
(REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION)
Written Comments of the Republic of Guatemala
1. In pursuance of the Court’s Order dated 17th January 2018, the Republic of Guatemala submits the following written comments in the proceedings related to the Request for an Advisory Opinion concerning the Legal Consequences of the Separation of the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius in 1965.

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF
THE SEPARATION OF CHAGOS FROM MAURITIUS IN 1965
REQUEST FOR AN ADVISORY OPINION
WRITTEN COMMENTS OF THE
ARGENTINE REPUBLIC
15MAY 2018
1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction
I. There are no compelling reasons to decline the exercise of the advisory jurisdiction
II. The content of the law of decolonization and its applicability to this case
A. Manda tory character of General Assembly resolutions in the field of decolonization