INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
CASE CONCERNING
APPLICATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION FOR THE SUPPRESSION OF THE FINANCING OF TERRORISM AND
OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON THE ELIMINATION OF ALL FORMS OF RACIAL DISCRIMINATION
(UKRAINE V. RUSSIAN FEDERATION)
PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS SUBMITTED BY THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
Volume I
12 SEPTEMBER 2018
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I INTRODUCTION
1
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
CASE CONCERNING
APPLICATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION FOR THE SUPPRESSION
OF THE FINANCING OF TERRORISM AND OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON THE ELIMINATION OF ALL FORMS OF RACIAL DISCRIMINATION
(UKRAINE V. RUSSIAN FEDERATION)
WRITTEN STATEMENT OF OBSERVATIONS AND SUBMISSIONS ON THE PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION SUBMITTED BY UKRAINE
14 JANUARY 2019
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
CASE CONCERNING
APPLICATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION FOR THE SUPPRESSION
OF THE FINANCING OF TERRORISM AND OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION
ON THE ELIMINATION OF ALL FORMS OF RACIAL DISCRIMINATION
(UKRAINE V. RUSSIAN FEDERATION)
MEMORIAL
SUBMITTED BY UKRAINE
12 JUNE 2018
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
APPLICATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION
ON THE ELIMINATION OF ALL FORMS OF RACIAL DISCRIMINATION
(QATAR v. UNITED ARAB EMIRATES)
REQUEST FOR THE INDICATION OF PROVISIONAL MEASURES TO
PRESERVE THE UNITED ARAB EMIRATES’ PROCEDURAL RIGHTS
AND TO PREVENT QATAR FROM AGGRAVATING OR EXTENDING
THE DISPUTE
SUBMITTED BY THE UNITED ARAB EMIRATES
22 March 2019
I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
THE JADHA V CASE
THE REPUBLIC OF INDIA v. THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF
PAKISTAN
REJOINDER OF THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN
17TH JULY 2018
Page 1 of74
Contents
INTRODUCTION AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................... .4
I. INDIA'S REPLY IS REPLETE WITH MISREPRESENTATIONS AND IRRELEVANT
DIVERSIONS ......................................................................................................................................... 9
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
JADHAV CASE
(India v. Pakistan)
REPLY
OF
THE REPUBLIC OF INDIA
17 APRIL 2018
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
JADHAV CASE
(India v. Pakistan)
REPLY
OF
THE REPUBLIC OF INDIA
17 APRIL 2018
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................ 1
II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND...................................................................................... 9
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
THE JADHA V CASE
THE REPUBLIC OF INDIA v. THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF
PAKISTAN
COUNTER-MEMORIAL OF THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF
PAKISTAN
13TH DECEMBER 2017
Page 1 of 147
Contents
I. INTRODUCTION AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................. 5
II. F ACTUAL BACKGROUND .............................................................................................. 10
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
JADHAV CASE
(India v. Pakistan)
MEMORIAL
OF
THE REPUBLIC OF INDIA
13 SEPTEMBER 2017
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
JADHAV CASE
(India v. Pakistan)
MEMORIAL
OF
THE REPUBLIC OF INDIA
13 SEPTEMBER 2017
Table of Contents
I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 1
II. JURISDICTION .................................................................................................. 6
Written Observations of J a pan on the Declaration of Intervention of New ZeàÏaiid
1. J~pâii takès .notè ofthë decisicîn biNêw-Z.ëaj.âlid tô ë:i:èr9ise its rlght of iritervéntj~ri
:fu the case conceming Vlhalini:!· in the.Antarctic· fAustralia: v. Jaoan) pürstiant to Artide ....... ··•··-··' ··- - . ---·.
63: ofth~ Stafute oftbé Cow°(as ,;v~ll a$'.Ar.tides ·82:t<;> 85. qfthe: Rwes .~f Coμrt ,..,.:_ith the
·conseq_uënce tlïaMhe ëOD.stiilction'gtV~_n; p~/ ih~Ju~ffiJreQt: "-'ill, bê' ~ua~y "QindJng ûpdrj
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF füSTICE
WHALING IN THE ANTARCTIC
(A USTRALIA v. JAPAN)
WRJTTEN OBSERVATIONS OF AUSTRALIA ON
THE DECLARATION OF INTERVENTION BY THE
GOVERNMENTOFNEWZEALAND
18 DECEMBER2012
On 20 November 2012, New Zealand, invoking Article 63 of the Statute of the Comt
("the Statute"), filed a Declaration of h1tervention ("the New Zealand Declaration")1 in this
case. By letter of the same date, the Registrar of the Court, acting in accordance with