Written responses of the United States of America to the questions put by the Chamber of the Court on 23 and 27 February 1989
CORRESPONDENCE 449
80. TEE CO-AGENT OF TEE UNITED STAm OF AMERlCATO THEREGlSTRAR
27 February 1989.
other_document
Title
Other documents
Written replies of Italy to the questions put by members of the Chamber of the Court on 23 February 1989
CORRESPONDENCE 457
Final Submissions of rheGovernmeniof the UnitedSraresin rhecme concerning
Elettronica Sicula S.P.A.
The United States requests that the objection of the Respondent be dismissed
and submits to the Court that it is entitled to a declaration and judgment that:
Observations of the Republic of Djibouti on the reply given by the French Republic to the question put by Judge Simma at the close of the first round of oral argument (translation)
Letter dated 1 February 2008 to the Registrar from the Deputy Agent
of the Republic of Djibouti
[Translation]
In reference to the explanations given by the French Republic on 29 January 2008 during the
second round of oral argument in reply to a question put by JudgeSimma on 25January2008
during the first round of oral argument, I have the honour, on the instructions of the Agent of the
Republic of Djibouti, to submit the following observations to the Court.
Written responses of the United States of America to the question put by Judge Schwebel during the public sitting held on 16 February 1989
CORRESPONDENCE 431
ELSI: ASSETS AT 31 MARCH 1968
Realizable
Book value value
Tangible assets
Fixed assets
Inventories
Accounts receivable
Other assets
Intangible assets
17February 1989.
Written response of Greece to the question put by Judge Cançado Trindade at the end of the public sitting held on 16 September 2011 (translation)
R ESPONSE TO THE QUESTION PUT TO G REECE
BY J UDGE C ANÇADO T RINDADE
1. It should first be recalled that the Special Supreme Court (SSC) does not rank as a
supreme court within Greece’s legal order. The SSC has a sui generis legal status in the Greek
system of courts. With its dual jurisdic tional role under Article100 of the 1975 Greek
Joint Letter from the Agents of the Respondent States
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
CASE CONCERNING LEGALITY OF USE OF FORCE
FURTHERDOCUMENTSSUBNDTTEDBY
THE RESPONDENTS PURSUANT TO
ARTICLE 56 OF THE RULES OF THE COURT
FEBRUARY 2004
/
1 ..
27 February2004
Written response of Georgia to the questions put by Judges Koroma and Cançado Trindade at the end of the public sitting held on Friday 17 September 2010
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
APPLICATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL COl'i'VENTION ON THE
ELI1\1INATION OF ALL FOR1VISOF RAClAL DISCRIMINATION
(GEORGIA v. RUSSIAN FEDERATION)
ANS\VERS OF GEORGIA TO JUDGES' QUlrSTIONS
24 SEPTEMBER 2010 A.NSW"ERSTO JUDGES' QUESTIONS
ANSWER TO QUESTION FROM JUDGE KOROMA
The question:
What precisely, in the view of the Parties, is the abject and purpose of the clause
Written response of Germany to the questions put by Judge Bennouna, Judge Cançado Trindade and Judge ad hoc Gaja at the end of the public sitting held on 16 September 2011
[Translation by the Registry]
I.) Question put to Germany by Judge Bennouna at the end of the public sitting of
16 September 2011
If no other remedy is available for individual victims of serious violations of human rights or
humanitarian law committed on their territory by a foreign State, would it be admissible for the
latter to raise a plea of immunity from jurisdiction jure imperii before the courts of the forum
State?
Reply of the Kingdom of Cambodia to the question put to the Parties by Judge Cançado Trindade (translation)
- 2 -
Letter to the Registrar dated 6 June 2011 from
the Agent of Cambodia
[Translation]
Please find below the replies of Cambodia to the questions put by Judge Cançado Trindade
at the end of the sitting of 31 May.
Cambodia has understood the questions as pertaining to the population displacements, firstly,