Annex 1toOP 2003/30
CASE CONCERNING OIL PLATFORMS
(Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America)
RESPONSE TO THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN TO THE QUESTIONS OF
JUDGE RIGAUX ADDRESSED TO BOTH PARTIES
FIRST QUESTION:
"What is the legal status of oil platforms constructed by a State on its continental shelf?
CORRESPONDENCE 475
2. The Exchange of Notes of 13 November 1973 between Jceland and the
United Kîn~gdom, the Arrangement relating to fisheries in waters surrounding
the Faroe Islands of 18 Deccntber 1973 and the Agreement of 15 March 1974
between Norway, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and the United
Kingdom on the Regulation of the Fishing of North East Arctic (Arcto
Norwegian) Cod have been registered with the Secretariat of the United
Nations.
CORRESPONDENCE 391
45. THE COUNSEL FOR THE GOVERNMENT OF THE
UNITED KINGDOM TO THE REGISTRAR
3 August 1972.
On 2 August you were good enough to hand me the text of 2 questions
which the Court wished to address to the Agent for the Government of the
United Kingdom.
• 1
RESPONSE OF SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO TO THE QUESTIONS POSED BY
THE VICE-PRESIDENT OF THE COURT ON 9 MAY 2006
1.
On 9 May 2006, the Vice-President of the Court posed the following question to both parties:
"In 1996 the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia concluded two bilateral agreements
with Croatia and Macedonia, respectively, and its President made a joint declaration
Question by Judge Guillaume
"Je serais reconnaissant au représentant des Nations Unies de fournir toute information
en sa possession sur les travaux préparatoires de la décision1998/297 par laquelle le Conseil
économique et social a saisi la Cour." [CR 98/17, p.53J
Answer
1. The Economie and Social Council formally considered the Note by the Secretary-General
DIFFERENCE RELATING TO IMMUNITY FROM LEGAL PROCESS
OF A SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR Of THE COMMISSION ON HUMAN
RIGHTS: COMMENTS BY THEGQVERNMENT QE MALAYSIA ON
THE ANSWERS ON BEHALE OF THE SECRETABY-GENERAL OF
THE UNIIEb NATIONS TO THE QUESTIONS ASKED B'( JUQGEii
GUILLAUME AND KAROMA
1. Wi1h respectto the answer to the Question askby Judge
Guillaume;
1. The Government of Malaysia obsèrves that in the summary
22-DEC-2009 15: 46 FROM LEGAL ADlJISERS
TO 90031703649928 P.03
UNITED KINGDOM'S RESPONSE TO THE QUESTIONS PUT BY
JUDGES KOROMAANDCANÇADOTRJ.NDADE
1. Judge Koroma put the folJowing question to the participants at the end of
the oral proceedings:
ROYAUME DE BELGIQUE du Commercees extérieuréetrangères.
de la Coopération au Développement 1,,
ARREST WARRANT OF 11 APRIL 2000 (DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE
CONGO v.BELGIUM)
Reply by Belgium to the question raised by Judge Koroma at the conclusion of
the oral hearing on 19 October 2001(CR 2001111,p.19)
CORRESPONDENCE 503
66, THE REGISTRAR TO THE AGENT OF THE UBYAN ARAB JAMAHIRIYA
27 January 1984.
I have the honour toacknowledge receipt of the letter dated 23 January 1984
in which you give your views on the accessibility to the public of the written
observations of the Parties on Italy's Application for permission to intervene in
the case conceming the Continental Shelf (Lihyan Arah Jamahiriya/Ma/ta).