other_document

Title
Other documents

Reply of the French Republic to the questions posed by Judges Koroma and Cançado Trindade at the close of the oral proceedings (translation)

Reply of the French Republic to questions posed by Judges Koroma
and Cançado Trindade at the close of the oral proceedings

[Translation]

Reply of the French Republic to the question

posed by Judge Cançado Trindade

1. Judge Cançado Trindade’s qu estion relates to two sets of problems, one of which, for the

Comments of the Kingdom of Cambodia on the reply provided by the Kingdom of Thailand to the question put to the Parties by Judge Cançado Trindade (translation)

Letter to the Registrar dated 13 June 2011 from

the Agent of Cambodia

[Translation]

Please find below some comments on the reply provided by Thailand to the question put by
Judge Cançado Trindade.

Firstly, Cambodia notes that Thailand gives very little information on the area of the Temple

Reply of the United States of America to questions posed by Judges Koroma
and Cançado Trindade at the close of the oral proceedings

Question put by Judge Koroma

It has been contended that international law does not prohibit the secession of a territory
from a sovereign State. Could participants in these proceedings address the Court on the
principles and rules of international law, if any, which, outside the colonial context, permit the

secession of a territory from a sovereign State without the latter' s consent?

Answer of the United States of America

Written response of Nicaragua to the question put to it by Judge Donoghue at the end of the hearing held on 15 October 2010, at 5 p.m.

REPUBLIC OF NICARAGUA

TERRITORIALANDMARITIMEDISPUTE

(NICARAGUA V. COLOMBIA)

PROCEEDINGS ON WHETHER TO GRANT COSTA RICA'S APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION TO
INTERVENE

The Hague, 22 October 2010

ANSWER TO JUDGE DONOGHUE'S QUESTION

Question : Nicaragua bas made written and oral sùbmissions to the Court regarding

Reply of Romania to questions posed by Judges Koroma and Cançado Trindade
at the close of the oral proceedings

A. Questionaddressedby Judge Koroma:

"It has been contented that international law does not prohibit the secession of a territory from a
sovereign State. Could participants in these proceedings address the Court on the principles and rules

of internationallaw, if any, which, outside the colonial context,permit the secession of a territory from

a sovereignStatewithout the latter's consent?"

Remania's approach

1. During the written and oral proceedings of the case regarding the Accordance with

Questions put by Members of the Court at the close of the hearing held on 16 March 2012: replies or supplementary replies of the Senegalese Government to the questions put to both Parties by Judges Ab

INTERNATIONAL C OURT OF J USTICE

Case concerning
Questions relating to the Obligation to Prosecute or Extradite
(Belgium v. Senegal)

Supplementary written replies of the Government of Senegal to the questions put
by judges at the close of the hearing held on 16 March 2012

submitted by

Reply of the Argentine Republic to the questions posed by Judges Koroma and Cançado Trindade at the close of the oral proceedings (translation)

Reply of the Argentine Republic to questions posed by Judges Koroma
and Cançado Trindade at the close of the oral proceedings

[Translation]

Question posed by Judge Koroma:

“It has been contended that international law does not prohibit the secession of a

territory from a sovereign State. Could participants in these proceedings address the
Court on the principles and rules of international law, if any, which, outside the

Subscribe to other_document
Links