431

SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE SEBUTINDE

420

SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE XUE

1. Although I concur with the Court’s conclusion that special permits
granted by Japan under JARPA II do not fall within the meaning of Arti-
cle VIII, paragraph 1, of the International Convention for the Regulation

405

SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE GREENWOOD

383

DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE YUSUF

348

SEPARATE OPINION

OF JUDGE CANÇADO TRINDADE

table of contents

Paragraphs

I. The Object and Purpose oéf the ICRW 2-9

1. The teleological approach 4-7
2. Response of New Zealand to questions from the Bench 8-9

341

DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE BENNOUNA

[English Original Text]

336

DECLARATION OF JUDGE KEITH

1. As my votes indicate, I agree with the conclusions the Court has
reached. I also agree generally with the reasons it has given in reachinég
those conclusions. My purpose in this declaration is to address three mat-

ters in support of those reasons :

321

DISSENTING OPINION
OF JUDGE ABRAHAM

[Traduction]

Agreement with Judgment’s operative paragraph in its dismissal of Jap▯an’s

301

DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE OWADA

1. To my greatest regret, I cannot associate myself with the present
Judgment in terms of the conclusions stated in paragraphs 2, 3, 5 and 7 of
its operative part, as well as the reasoning stated in the reasoning parét.
My disagreement lies with the understanding of the Judgment on the

768

DECLARATION OF JUDGE AD HOC COT

[Translation]

Specific circumstances of the western Caribbean — Multilateral management

through a network of bilateral treaties — Rights of third States affected by the
Judgment — Overly complicated nature of the course of the delimitation — Status
of States not parties to the 1982 Convention with respect to the delimitation of the
continental shelf beyond 200 nautical miles.