481

SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE SKOTNIKOV

471

SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE ABRAHAM

[Translation]

464

DECLARATION OF JUDGE OWADA

1. I have voted in favour of the Judgment in support of all the points
contained in its operative paragraph 122. Nevertheless, I entertain some
divergence of views from the position taken by the present Judgment withv

70

SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE MAHIOU

[Translatwn}

App!Jcatwnfor revrswn - Admrsslblilfy of the Appllcatwn - Article 61 of
the Statute of the Court- Notwn of 'fact"- Existence or non-ex1stenceof a
newfact- Membersh1pm the Umted Natwns- Jurzsdzctwn ratiOne personae,
ratwne matenae arJd'fat'lOne.tempons of the Court -Admtsswn to the Umted
Natwns and consequences- GenoctdeConventwn- Conduct of the Appltcant
- Fault of the Appl!cant

53

DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE DIMITRIJEVIé

51

DECLARATION OF JUDGE REZEK

[Translatwn]

1 In the opmton of the maJonty of the Court, the Apphcatwn for
revlSlonsubmltted by the Federal Repubhc ofYugoslavta ISmadmtsstble
Accordmgly, the Genoczde case, m whtch Bosma and Herzegovma ts the
Apphcant and the Federal Repubhc of Yugoslavta the Respondent, must
take tts normal course In no way can 1 support this concluswn

39

DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE VERESHCHETIN

34

SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE KOROMA

DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE AD HOC VINUESA

1. Although I agree with the first paragraph of the dispositive concern-
ing Uruguay’s breaches of procedural obligations under the 1975 Statute,
I do not share the views of the majority concerning: (1) the relationship
between procedural obligations and substantial obligations; (2) the non-

SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE AD HOC
TORRES BERNÁRDEZ

[Translation]

The opinion only focuses on certain conclusions in the Judgment relating to