•
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
CASE CONCERNING OIL PLATFORMS
• (ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN V. UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA)

•
VIEWS ON IRAN'S "REQUEST FOR HEARING IN RELATION
TO THE UNITED STATES' COUNTER-CLAIM PURSUANT TO
ARTICLE 80(3) OF THE RULES OF COURT"
• SUBMITTED BY
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

• DECEMBER 18,1997

•

USITED KISGDO.\I COUSTER->IEMORIAI. (4 II52)
130
I'nrizgrnph
they had bcen called as witnesses, the evidence of
Major Laing or Sir Joseph hlaclay would have
~xoved the existence of such an oral agreement jj-63
The decision of Mr. Justice Hill in the Admiralty
Court and that of the Court of Appeal were hoth
just and in accordance aith the rules of Englisli
law and practice ; in these proceedings the Clai-

INTERNA TIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE

MARITIME DELIMITATION
BETWEEN NICARAGUA AND HONDURAS
IN THE CARIBBEAN SEA

(NICARAGUA v. HONDURAS)

COUNTER-MEMORIAL

OF THE REPUBLIC OF HONDURAS

VOLUME 1

21 MARCH 2002 iii

CONTENTS

LIST OF COLOUR PLATES IN VOLUME 1....................................................vii...

INTERNATIONALCOURTOFJUSTICE

DISPUTE CONCERNING

NAVIGATIONAL AND RELATEDRIGHTS

COSTARICA v.NICARAGUA

mPLY OFCOSTAIUCA

VOLUME 1

15January2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Chapter 1 Introduction
A . Introductory Comments ..........................................1...............

B. Nicaragua's Counter-Memorial .................................2...........

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE

MARITIME DELIMITATION
BETWEEN NICARAGUA AND HONDURAS
IN THE CARIBBEAN SEA
(NICARAGUA v. HONDURAS)

MEMORIAL
SUBMITTED BY

THE GOVERNMENT OF
NICARAGUA

VOLUME!

21 MARCH 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHAPTER

1 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 . . . . . .

II THE GEOGRAPHICAL AND
GEOMORPHOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK . . . . . . . . 5 . .

International Court of Justice

Written Observations of the
United States of America

on the Application for Interpretation of the
Judgment of 31 March 2004 in the
Case Concerning Avena and Other Mexican
Nationals

(Mexico v. United States of America)

August 29, 2008 Table of Contents

I. The United States Has Consistently
Interpreted the Avena Judgment to Impose

an “Obligation of Result”..................................................... 1

INTERNATIONALCOURTOF
JUSTICE

LEGALITY OF THE USE BY A STATE OF NUCLEAR

WEAPONS IN ARMEDCONFLICT

(REQUESTFORAN ADVISORYOPINION)

RESPONSE TO SUBMISSIONS OF
OTHERSTATES BYTHE REPUBLICOF NAURU RESPONSE TO SUBMISSIONS OF

OTHERSTATES BYTHE REPUBLICOF NAURU

Introduction