President LA CH^ makes the following declaration:

While 1am in full agreement with the reasoning and conclusions of the

DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE BUSTAMAKTE
[Translation]

DISSENTING OPINION BY JUDGE KORETSKY

1 regret that 1cannot agree with the Opinion of the Court both
(a) as 1 do not consider that the Court would and should give an
opinion on the given question posed to it by the General Assembly
of the United Nations, and (b) as the Court, to my mind, did not

DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE MORENO QUINTANA
[Translation]

DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE BASDEVANT

DISSENTING OPINION OF PRESIDENT WINIARSKI

[Translation]

SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE MORELLI
[Translation ]

SEPARATE OPINION OF

JUDGE SIR GERALD FITZMAURICE

SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE SIR PERCY SPENDER

1 agree that the question should be answered in the affirmative.
The Court is called upon to answer a question which, exceedingly
important though it is, lieswithin a comparatively limited compass.
That question is whether certain particularized expenditure-
money spent or to be spent-authorized by certain specifiedresolu-
tions of the General Assembly, constitute "expenses of the Organi-
zation" within the meaning of Article 17 (2) of the Charter.

Force undertaken in pursuance of General Assembly resolutions
997 (ES-1) of 2 November 1956, 998 (ES-1) and 999 (ES-1) of
4 November 1956, 1000 (ES-1) of 5 November 1956, 1001 (ES-1) of
7 November 1956, 1121 (XI) of 24 November 1956 and 1263 (XIII)
of 14 November 1958, constitute "expenses of the Organization"
within the meaning of Article 17, paragraph 2, of the Charter of
the United Nations.