COUR INTERNATIONALE DE JUSTICE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
DIFFERENCE RELATING TO
IMMUNITY FROM LEGAL PROCESS
OF A SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR OF
THE COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS
COUR INTERNATIONALE DE JUSTICE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
BEFORE THE
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
Request by the
United Nations Economic and Social Council
for an Advisory Opinion on the
Difference Relating to Immunity From
Legal Process of a Special Rapporteur
of the Commission on Human Rights
COUR INTERNATIONALE DE JUSTICE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
DIFFERENCE RELATING TO IMMUNITY FROM LEGAL PROCESS
OF A SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR OF THE COMMISSION ON HUMAN
RIGHTS
(Request for an Advisory Opinion by the United Nations
Economic and Social Council)
Statement of the Government of the United Kingdom
OCTOBER 1998
COUR INTERNATIONALE DE JUSTICE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
EMBASSY OF SWEDEN
The Embassy of Sweden presents its compliments to the
Registrar of the International Court of Justice, and with
reference to the letter of 10 August 1998 by which the
Government of Sweden was invited to present its views
regarding the case of Dato' Param Cumaraswamy, has the honour
to communicate the following.
NoteVerbal.daie20June1995hm theEmbassyofNew &alan4
togetherwithWritStaternotftheGovermeniofNewZealand The Embassy of New Zealand presents its compliments
to the International Court of Justice in The Hague
and, with reference to the decision of the United
Nations General Assembly, recorded in its resolution
49/75K, to seek an advisory opinion from the Court on
the question: "1s the threat of nuclear weapons in
any circumstance permitted under international law?",
International Court of Justice
Arrest Warrant of 11 April 2000
(Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Belgium)
Counter Memorial of the
Kingdom of Belgium
28 September 2001
Introduction
1
INTRODUCTION
0.1 By an Application dated 17 October 2000 filed with the Registry of the
Court, the Democratic Republic of the Congo (“DRC”) instituted proceedings against
the Kingdom of Belgium (“Belgium”) alleging that, in consequence of the issue of an
iNTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
PASSAGE THROUGH THE GREAT BELT
(FINLANv.DENMARK)
COUNTER-MEMORIAL
SUBMITTED BY
THE GOVERNMENT OF THE
KINGDOM OF DENMARK
VOLUME 1
MAY 1992 VOLUME1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
INTRODUCTION ........................... 3
PART 1 . THE FACTS .......................... 11
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
CASE CONCERNING KASIKILI/SEDUDU ISLAND
(BOTSWANA/NAMIBIA)
MEMORIAL
OF
THE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA
VOLUME I
MEMORIAL
28 February 1997
__________
Memorial of the Republic of Namibia
INTRODUCTION
A. Procedural Statement
B. Summary of Argument
COUR INTERNATIONALE DE JUSTICE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
Translation
Federal Foreign Office
Legal Adviser and
Head of the Legal Directorate-General
Bonn, 5 October 1998
Mr Eduardo Valencia-Ospina
Registrar of the International Court of Justice
Peace Palace
2517 KJ The Hague
Dear Sir,
Thank you for your letter of 10 August 198 to the Federal Minister for Foreign Affairs, which
was forwarded to me.
IntheNameof God
INTERNATIONALCOURTOFJUSTICE
CASE CONCERNING OIL PLATFORMS
(ISLAMICREPUBLICOFIRANV.
UNITEDSTATES OFAMERICA)
FURTHER RESPONSETOTHEUNITEDSTATES'
COUNTER-CLAIM
Submittedby the
ISLAMIC REPUBLICOFIRAN
Volume1
24 September2001 1
TABLEOFCONTENTS
PaRe