SEPARATE OPINION OF PRESIDENT DONOGHUE
Second aspect of the dispute  Ukraine transformed subject of the dispute originally brought before the Court  Inadmissibility of claims as formulated in the Memorial  Court should have accepted jurisdiction ratione materiae over the claims as formulated in the Application.
1. I submit this separate opinion to explain my votes in relation to subparagraphs (2) and (4) of the operative paragraph of today’s Judgment.

2 FÉVRIER 2024
ARRÊT
ALLÉGATIONS DE GÉNOCIDE AU TITRE DE LA CONVENTION POUR LA PRÉVENTION ET LA RÉPRESSION DU CRIME DE GÉNOCIDE (UKRAINE c. FÉDÉRATION DE RUSSIE ; 32 ÉTATS INTERVENANTS)
___________
ALLEGATIONS OF GENOCIDE UNDER THE CONVENTION ON THE PREVENTION AND PUNISHMENT OF THE CRIME OF GENOCIDE (UKRAINE v. RUSSIAN FEDERATION: 32 STATES INTERVENING)
2 FEBRUARY 2024
JUDGMENT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Paragraphs
CHRONOLOGY OF THE PROCEDURE 1-28
I. GENERAL BACKGROUND 29-37
II. EXISTENCE AND SUBJECT OF THE DISPUTE 38-57