Letter to the President of the Court from the Permanent Representative
of the Republic of Guinea to the United Nations

dated 15 January 2004

[ Translation]

Referring to the Order issued on 19 December 2003 entitled “L egal Consequences of the
Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Pales tinian Territory ” and pursuant to Article 66,
paragraph 2, of the Statute of the International Court of Justice, I have the honour to inform you, on

~UUIiiilemationaieae Justice
Enregistréau Gref:ele

InFiled inthe Regis:r3o0tJAN 2.004/31

Written Statementsubmittedby ~akistan concerning the

Advisory Opinionbythe InternationalCourt of Justice in
Accordancewith Article66, paragraph 2 of the Statute ofthe
InternationalCourtofJustice onthe question of the Legal
ConsequencesarisingfromtheConstructionof a Wall by

Courinternationalede Justice
Enregistréau Greffe:le
EMBASSY OF JAPAN ----------
InternationalCourtof Justice
IN Filedinthe Registryo: 30- :n~ 2~04/2 8
THE NETHERLANDS

Mr. P. Couvreur
Registrar
International Court of Justice

Peace Palace
Carnegieplein 2
2517 KJ The Hague

INTERNATIONAL COURT OP JUSTICE

PLEADINGS, ORAL ARGUMENTS, DOCUMENTS

so-UTH WEST AFRICA CASES

(ETHlOPIA v. SOUTH AFRICA;
LIBERIAv.SOUTH AFRICA)

VOLUME II

1966

COUR INTERNATIONALE DE JUSTICE

MÉMOIRES, PLAIDOIRIES ET DOCUMENTS

AFFAIRES DU SUD-OUEST AFRICAIN
(ÉTHIOPIE c. AFRIQDU SUD;

LIBÉRIA AFRIQUE DU SUD)

Abbreviated reference:
I.C.J. Pleadings, South West Africa,
Vol. V

Référenceabrégée:
C.I.]. Mémoires,Sud-Ouest africain,
. .
vol. V

Sales nmnber
N° de vente: 312All rights reserved by the
International Court of Justice
Tous droits réservés par la
Cour internationale de Justice SOUTH WEST AFRICA CASES
(ETHIOPIA v. SOUTH AFRICA;

LIBERIA v.SOUTH AFRICA)

HIGHLIGHTED VERSION
The highlighted versions of Qatar's Memorial and Counter-

Memorial are designed to assist the Court in determining which
passages of those pleadings are no longer relied upon by Qatar
because they depend solely upon documentary annexes which
Qatar has pledged itself to disregard (See Qatar's Reply, para.
1.12)

IN THENAME OF GOD

THE MERCIFUL, THEBENEVOLENT INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE

CASECONCERNINGMARITIMEDELIMITATION

AND TERRITORIAL QUESTIONS
BETWEEN

QATARAND BAHRAIN
(QATAVBAHRAIN)

MEMORIAL

SUBMITTBY

THESTASEOF QATAR

VOLUME 1

30 SEPTEMBER 1996 i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE

REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION

LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF A WALL
IN THE OCCUPIED PALESTINIAN TERRITORY

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE FRENCH REPUBLIC

30 January 2004

[Translation by the Registry] International Court of Justice

Request for Advisory Opinion

Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory

CourinternatideJustice
EnregistauGreffe le

internationalCourtof3J0sjAh,ZuV /r21
Filedinthe Regi:tryon

Request by the United Nations General Assembly
for an Advisory Opinion on the Question of
What are the Legal Consequences Arising
from the Construction for the Wall being Built by Israel,
Occupying Power,in the Occupied Palestine Territory, including
in and around EastJerusalem