COUR INTERNATIONALE DE JUSTICE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE

COMMENTS OF THE UNITED STATES

Pursuant to the Court's Order of August 10, 1998, the United States offers the following
comments on the written statements submitted to the Court concerning the request for an
advisory opinion on the question of the Difference Relating to Immunity from Legal Process
of a Special Rapporteur of the Commission on Human Rights.

NUCLEARTESTS CASEflVEWZEALANDV FRANm

IA~~iicationof9 Mav 1973)

FURTFlERREOUESTFOR THE INDICATIONOFPROVISIONAL

MEASURES

CASETO WHICHTHIS REOUESTRELATES

1. 1 have the honour to refer to the proceedings comnced by the

Applicationfiled by New Zealandaeainst France on 9 May 1973 in the case cntitled

NuclearTestsCase (Uew Zeaiarid1Fratice).These proceedingsled to an Order of the

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE

CASE CONCERNING KASIKILI/SEDUDU ISLAND

(BOTSWANA/NAMIBIA)

REPLY

OF

THE REPUBLIC OF BOTSWANA

VOLUME I

NOVEMBER 1998

__________

LIST OF ANNEXES IN CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER (VOLUME II) ix

CONSOLIDATED INDEX OF ANNEXES IN THE MEMORIAL, COUNTER-

MEMORIAL AND REPLY OF BOTSWANA xi

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE

CASE CONCERNING KASIKILI/SEDUDU ISLAND

(BOTSWANA/NAMIBIA)

COUNTER-MEMORIAL OF THE

REPUBLIC OF BOTSWANA

VOLUME I

NOVEMBER 1997

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHAPTER 1: THE HISTORY OF THE DISPUTE

CHAPTER 2: THE DIPLOMATIC RESURGENCE OF THE BOUNDARY DISPUTE

CHAPTER 3: THE SUBSTANTIAL FLAWS IN THE NAMIBIAN MEMORIAL

COUR INTERNATIONALE DE JUSTICE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE

Difference Relating to Immunity
From a Legal Process of
A Special Rapporteur of
The Commission on Human Rights
(Request for Advisory Opinion)

Statement of the Government of Malaysia

October 1998