Links

Site search
Document search
Contact

The Court

History
Members of the Court
Presidency
Chambers and Committees
Judges ad hoc
How the Court Works
Financial Assistance to Parties
Annual Reports

The Registry

Registrar
Organizational Chart of the Registry
Texts governing the Registry
Library of the Court
Employment
University traineeship program
Internships
Procurement

Cases

List of All Cases
Judgments, Advisory Opinions and Orders

Basic Documents

Charter of the United Nations
Statute of the Court
Rules of Court
Practice Directions
Other Texts

Jurisdiction

Contentious Jurisdiction
Advisory Jurisdiction

Press Room

Press releases
Calendar
Media Services
Multimedia
Frequently Asked Questions

Practical Information

Directions
Visits
Links
Frequently Asked Questions

Publications

Introduction

Permanent Court of International Justice

Series A: Collection of Judgments (1923-1930)
Series B: Collection of Advisory Opinions (1923-1930)
Series A/B: Collection of Judgments, Orders and Advisory Opinions (from 1931)
Series C: Acts and documents relating to Judgments and Advisory Opinions given by the Court / Pleadings, Oral Arguments and Documents
Series D: Acts and Documents concerning the organization of the Court
Series E: Annual Reports
Series F: General Indexes
Other documents


Français

Applicability of Article VI, Section 22, of the Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations

Overview of the case

On 24 May 1989, the Economic and Social Council of the United Nations (ECOSOC) adopted a resolution whereby it requested the Court to give, on a priority basis, an advisory opinion on the question of the applicability of Article VI, Section 22, of the Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations in the case of Mr. Dumitru Mazilu, Rapporteur of the Sub-Commission on the Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities of the Commission on Human Rights. Mr. Mazilu, a Romanian national, had been entrusted, by a resolution of the Sub-Commission, with the task of drawing up a report on “Human Rights and Youth” in connection with which the Secretary-General was asked to provide him with all the assistance he might need. Mr. Mazilu was absent from the 1987 session of the Sub-Commission, during which he was to have filed his report, and Romania let it be known that he had been taken into hospital. Mr. Mazilu’s mandate finally expired on 31 December 1987, but without his being relieved of the task of Rapporteur that had been assigned to him. Mr. Mazilu was able to get various messages through to the United Nations, in which he complained that the Romanian authorities were refusing him a travel permit. Moreover, those authorities, further to contacts initiated by the Under-Secretary-General for Human Rights at the request of the Sub-Commission, had let it be known that any intervention of the United Nations Secretariat would be considered as interference in Romania’s internal affairs. Those authorities subsequently informed the United Nations of their position with regard to the applicability to Mr. Mazilu of the Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations, asserting, inter alia, that the Convention did not equate Rapporteurs, whose activities were only occasional, with experts on missions for the United Nations ; that they could not, even if granted some of that status, enjoy anything more than functional immunities and privileges ; that those privileges and immunities began to apply only at the moment when the expert left on a journey connected with the performance of his mission ; and that in the country of which he was a national an expert enjoyed privileges and immunities only in respect of actual activities relating to his mission.

The Court rendered its Advisory Opinion on 15 December 1989, and began by rejecting Romania’s contention that the Court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the Request. Moreover, the Court did not find any compelling reasons that might have led it to consider it inappropriate to render an opinion. It then engaged in a detailed analysis of Article VI, Section 22, of the Convention, which relates to “Experts on missions for the United Nations”. It reached the conclusion, inter alia, that Section 22 of the Convention was applicable to persons (other than United Nations officials) to whom a mission had been entrusted by the Organization and who were therefore entitled to enjoy the privileges and immunities provided for in that Section with a view to the independent exercise of their functions ; that during the whole period of such missions, experts enjoyed these functional privileges and immunities whether or not they travelled ; and that those privileges and immunities might be invoked against the State of nationality or of residence unless a reservation to Section 22 of the Convention had been validly made by that State. Turning to the specific case of Mr. Mazilu, the Court expressed the view that he continued to have the status of Special Rapporteur, that as a consequence he should be regarded as an expert on mission within the meaning of Section 22 of the Convention and that that Section was accordingly applicable in his case.


This overview is provided for information only and in no way involves the responsibility of the Court.

Request for Advisory Opinion

Request for Advisory Opinion (including the dossier of documents transmitted to the Court pursuant to article 65, paragraph 2 of the Statute)

13 June 1989
Request for Advisory Opinion (including the dossier of documents transmitted to the Court pursuant to article 65, paragraph 2 of the Statute)
Available in:
English French

Written proceedings

Written Statements

27 July 1989
Available in:
English French

Oral proceedings

Verbatim record 1989

Oral Statements - Minutes of the Public Sittings held at the Peace Palace, The Hague, on 4 and 5 October and 15 December 1989, the President, Judge Ruda, presiding
Available in:
Original Language

Orders

Order of 14 June 1989

Fixing of time-limits: Written Statements and Written Comments
Available in:
English French Bilingual

Advisory opinions

Summaries of Advisory Opinions and Orders

Summary 1989/2

Summary of the Advisory Opinion of 15 December 1989
Available in:
English French

Press releases

Press release 1989/8

26 May 1989
First-ever request by the Economic and Social Council of the United Nations for an advisory opinion of the Court
Available in:
English French

Press release 1989/9

26 June 1989
Applicability of Article VI, Section 22, of the Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations - Fixing of the time-limits for the filing of written pleadings
Available in:
English French

Press release 1989/16

1 August 1989
Applicability of Article VI, Section 22, of the Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations - Submission of written statements
Available in:
English French

Press release 1989/18

6 September 1989
Applicability of Article VI, Section 22, of the Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations - Hearings on 4 October 1989
Available in:
English French

Press release 1989/21

5 October 1989
Applicability of Article VI, Section 22, of the Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations - Oral proceedings held
Available in:
English French

Press release 1989/23

11 December 1989
Applicability of Article VI, Section 22, of the Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations - Advisory Opinion to be delivered on 15 December 1989
Available in:
English French

Press release 1989/24

15 December 1989
Applicability of Article VI, Section 22, of the Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations - The Court delivers its Advisory Opinion
Available in:
English French

Correspondence

Correspondence

26 May 1989
Correspondence
Available in:
English French