Links

Site search
Document search
Contact

The Court

History
Members of the Court
Presidency
Chambers and Committees
Judges ad hoc
How the Court Works
Financial Assistance to Parties
Annual Reports

The Registry

Registrar
Organizational Chart of the Registry
Texts governing the Registry
Library of the Court
Employment
University traineeship program
Internships
Procurement

Cases

List of All Cases
Judgments, Advisory Opinions and Orders

Basic Documents

Charter of the United Nations
Statute of the Court
Rules of Court
Practice Directions
Other Texts

Jurisdiction

Contentious Jurisdiction
Advisory Jurisdiction

Press Room

Press releases
Calendar
Media Services
Multimedia
Frequently Asked Questions

Practical Information

Directions
Visits
Links
Frequently Asked Questions

Publications

Introduction

Permanent Court of International Justice

Series A: Collection of Judgments (1923-1930)
Series B: Collection of Advisory Opinions (1923-1930)
Series A/B: Collection of Judgments, Orders and Advisory Opinions (from 1931)
Series C: Acts and documents relating to Judgments and Advisory Opinions given by the Court / Pleadings, Oral Arguments and Documents
Series D: Acts and Documents concerning the organization of the Court
Series E: Annual Reports
Series F: General Indexes
Other documents


Français

Frontier Dispute (Burkina Faso/Niger)

Overview of the case

On 20 July 2010, Burkina Faso and Niger jointly submitted a frontier dispute between them to the Court, pursuant to a Special Agreement signed in Niamey on 24 February 2009 and which entered into force on 20 November 2009. In Article 2 of the Special Agreement, the Court was requested to determine the course of the boundary between the two countries in the sector from the astronomic marker of Tong-Tong to the beginning of the Botou bend and to place on record the Parties’ agreement [“leur entente”] on the results of the work of the Joint Technical Commission on Demarcation of the boundary.

In its Judgment of 16 April 2013, the Court indicated that, when it is seised on the basis of a Special Agreement, any request made by a party in its final submissions can fall within the jurisdiction of the Court only if it remains within the limits defined by the provisions of that Special Agreement. However, in the opinion of the Court, the request made by Burkina Faso in points 1 and 3 of its final submissions did not exactly correspond to the terms of the Special Agreement, since that State did not request the Court to “place on record the Parties’ agreement” (“leur entente”) regarding the delimitation of the frontier in the two demarcated sectors, but rather to delimit itself the frontier according to a line that corresponds to the conclusions of the Joint Technical Commission. Although the Court has the power to interpret the final submissions of the Parties in such a way as to maintain them within the limits of its jurisdiction under the Special Agreement, that is not, however, sufficient to entertain such a request : the object of that request must also fall within the Court’s judicial function, which is to decide, in accordance with international law, such disputes as are submitted to it. However, in the case in question, neither of the Parties had ever claimed that a dispute continued to exist between them concerning the delimitation of the frontier in the two sectors in question on the date when the proceedings were instituted — nor that such a dispute had subsequently arisen. Accordingly, the Court considered that Burkina Faso’s request exceeded the limits of its judicial function.

The Court then turned to the dispute actually submitted to it. It observed that Article 6 of the Special Agreement, entitled “Applicable Law”, highlighted, amongst the rules of international law applicable to the dispute, “the principle of the intangibility of boundaries inherited from colonization and the Agreement of 28 March 1987”. It noted that the first two Articles of that Agreement specify the acts and documents of the French colonial administration which must be used to determine the delimitation line that existed when the two countries gained independence. It observed in that connection that it follows from the 1987 Agreement that the Arrêté of 31 August 1927 adopted by the Governor-General ad interim of French West Africa with a view to “fixing the boundaries of the colonies of Upper Volta and Niger”, as clarified by its Erratum of 5 October 1927, is the instrument to be applied for the delimitation of the boundary. It further observed that the 1987 Agreement provides for the possibility of “the Arrêté and Erratum not suffic[ing]” and establishes that, in that event, “the course shall be that shown on the 1:200,000-scale map of the Institut géographique national de France, 1960 edition”.

The Court was of the opinion that a straight line connecting the Tong-Tong and Tao astronomic markers should be regarded as constituting the frontier between Burkina Faso and Niger in the sector in question, since the colonial administration officials interpreted the Arrêté in that manner.

The Court further noted that it is not possible to determine from the Arrêté how to connect the Tao astronomic marker to “the River Sirba at Bossébangou”. Recourse must therefore be had to the line appearing on the 1960 map of the Institut géographique national de France (IGN). Moreover, the Court declared that it could not uphold Niger’s requests that the said line be shifted slightly at the level of the localities of Petelkolé and Oussaltane, on the ground that these were purportedly administered by Niger during the colonial period. According to the Court, once it had been concluded that the Arrêté was insufficient, and in so far as it was insufficient, the effectivités could no longer play a role in the case.

The Court further considered that, according to the description in the Arrêté, the frontier line, after reaching the median line of the River Sirba while heading towards Bossébangou, at the point called SB on the sketch-map attached to the Judgment, follows that line upstream until its intersection with the IGN line, at the point called point A on the sketch-map attached to the Judgment. From that point, since the Arrêté does not suffice to determine precisely the course of the frontier line, that line follows the IGN line, turning up towards the north-west until the point, called point B on the sketch-map attached to the Judgment, where the IGN line markedly changes direction, turning due south in a straight line. As this turning point B is situated some 200 m to the east of the meridian which passes through the intersection of the Say parallel with the River Sirba, the IGN line does not cut the River Sirba at the Say parallel. However — the Court noted — the Arrêté expressly requires that the boundary line cut the River Sirba at that parallel. The frontier line must therefore depart from the IGN line as from point B and, instead of turning there, continue due west in a straight line until the point, called point C on the sketch-map attached to the Judgment, where it reaches the meridian which passes through the intersection of the Say parallel with the right bank of the River Sirba. According to the description in the Erratum, the frontier line then runs southwards along that meridian until the said intersection, at the point called point I on the sketch-map attached to the Judgment.

The Court finally observed that, according to the Arrêté, “[f]rom that point the frontier, following an east-south-east direction, continues in a straight line up to a point located 1,200 m to the west of the village of Tchenguiliba”. It considered that the Arrêté is precise in this section of the frontier, in that it establishes that the frontier line is a straight-line segment between the intersection of the Say parallel with the Sirba and the point located 1,200 m to the west of the village of Tchenguiliba, which marks the start of the southern section of the already demarcated portion of the frontier.

The Court decided that, having regard to the circumstances of the case, it would nominate at a later date, by means of an Order, the experts requested by the Parties in Article 7, paragraph 4, of the Special Agreement to assist them in the demarcation of their frontier in the area in dispute. By an Order of 12 July 2013, the Court nominated the said three experts. The case was thus completed and was removed from the Court’s List.


This overview is provided for information only and in no way involves the responsibility of the Court.

Institution of proceedings

Special Agreement

21 July 2010
Available in:
English French

Written proceedings

Memorial of Niger

20 April 2011
Available in:
English French

Oral proceedings

Verbatim record 2012/19

Public sitting held on Monday 8 October 2012, at 10 a.m., at the Peace Palace, President Tomka presiding, in the case concerning the Frontier Dispute (Burkina Faso/Niger)
Available in:
Original Language
Translation
(bilingual version) Translation

Verbatim record 2012/20

Public sitting held on Monday 8 October 2012, at 3 p.m., at the Peace Palace, President Tomka presiding, in the case concerning the Frontier Dispute (Burkina Faso/Niger)
Available in:
Original Language
Translation
(bilingual version) Translation

Verbatim record 2012/21

Public sitting held on Tuesday 9 October 2012, at 10 a.m., at the Peace Palace, President Tomka presiding, in the case concerning the Frontier Dispute (Burkina Faso/Niger)
Available in:
Original Language
Translation
(bilingual version) Translation

Verbatim record 2012/22

Public sitting held on Thursday 11 October 2012, at 3 p.m., at the Peace Palace, President Tomka presiding, in the case concerning the Frontier Dispute (Burkina Faso/Niger)
Available in:
Original Language
Translation
(bilingual version) Translation

Verbatim record 2012/23

Public sitting held on Friday 12 October 2012, at 10 a.m., at the Peace Palace, President Tomka presiding, in the case concerning the Frontier Dispute (Burkina Faso/Niger)
Available in:
Original Language
Translation
(bilingual version) Translation

Verbatim record 2012/24

Public sitting held on Friday 12 October 2012, at 3 p.m., at the Peace Palace, President Tomka presiding, in the case concerning the Frontier Dispute (Burkina Faso/Niger)
Available in:
Original Language
Translation
(bilingual version) Translation

Verbatim record 2012/25

Public sitting held on Monday 15 October 2012, at 10 a.m., at the Peace Palace, President Tomka presiding, in the case concerning the Frontier Dispute (Burkina Faso/Niger)
Available in:
Original Language
Translation
(bilingual version) Translation

Verbatim record 2012/26

Public sitting held on Wednesday 17 October 2012, at 3 p.m., at the Peace Palace, President Tomka presiding, in the case concerning the Frontier Dispute (Burkina Faso/Niger)
Available in:
Original Language
Translation
(bilingual version) Translation

Other documents

Orders

Judgments

Summaries of Judgments and Orders

Summary 2013/1

Summary of the Judgment of 16 April 2013
Available in:
English French

Press releases

Press release 2010/24

21 July 2010
Burkina Faso and Niger jointly submit a frontier dispute to the International Court of Justice
Available in:
English French

Press release 2010/31

17 September 2010
Frontier Dispute (Burkina Faso/Niger) - Fixing of time-limits for the filing of the initial pleadings
Available in:
English French

Press release 2012/14

22 March 2012
Frontier Dispute (Burkina Faso/Niger) - The Court to hold public hearings from Monday 8 to Wednesday 17 October 2012
Available in:
English French

Press release 2012/25

19 September 2012
Frontier Dispute (Burkina Faso/Niger) - Live web streaming of the public hearings which will be held from Monday 8 to Wednesday 17 October 2012 - Schedule for the hearings
Available in:
English French

Press release 2012/29

4 October 2012
Frontier Dispute (Burkina Faso/Niger) - Broadcasting of the hearings online - Testing of the Court’s new web streaming system
Available in:
English French

Press release 2012/30

17 October 2012
Frontier Dispute (Burkina Faso/Niger) - Conclusion of the public hearings - Court to begin its deliberation
Available in:
English French

Press release 2013/5

8 April 2013
Frontier Dispute (Burkina Faso/Niger) - The Court to deliver its Judgment on Tuesday 16 April 2013 at 10 a.m.
Available in:
English French

Press release 2013/8

16 April 2013
Frontier Dispute (Burkina Faso/Niger) - The Court determines the course of the frontier between the two States in the sector running from the astronomic marker of Tong-Tong to the beginning of the Botou bend
Available in:
English French

Press release 2013/17

22 July 2013
Frontier Dispute (Burkina Faso/Niger) - The Court nominates experts to assist the Parties in the demarcation of their frontier
Available in:
English French